February 4, 2015
On Jobs and Regulation: In Graphs
There are two interesting trends in public policy. The unemployment rate is gradually decreasing, below six percent now, but the labor force participation rate is still historically abysmal. Yet, President Obama’s continued release of pricey new regulations continues to set records. How can so many “job-killing” rules find their way onto the backs of American businesses while the economy steadily improves?
Some have claimed that the falling unemployment rate proves that regulations can’t affect the economy and that rules don’t reduce employment. The reality, as demonstrated by plenty of economic research, is that targeted industries can experience significant job losses, but the national unemployment rate is generally unaffected. Typically, most regulations simply transfer labor from heavily regulated industries to the less regulated. However, as AAF has found, an average industry loses more than 8,100 jobs for every billion dollars in new regulatory costs.
Nowhere is this phenomenon more stark than in fossil-fueled power plants and coal mining. Regulators have added more than $10 billion in burdens on this industry since 2011, with the promise of at least $10 billion more in the immediate future. Not surprisingly, states and the industries as a whole have suffered tremendously.
Below are a series of graphs illustrating the interplay between billions of dollars in regulatory costs and affected industry employment since 2008 (all data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics).
Kentucky: 644 Lost Jobs: 37.4% Reduction
West Virginia: 1,316 Lost Jobs: 32.9 % Reduction
Ohio: 1,088 Lost Jobs: 21.8% Reduction
Pennsylvania: 729 Lost Jobs: 16.8% Reduction
Kentucky: 5,188 Lost Jobs: 30.7% Reduction
Wyoming: 195 Lost Jobs: 2.8% Reduction
Broader US Trends
US Coal Mining: 3,702 Lost Jobs: 4.5% Reduction
US Power Plant Jobs: 39,684 Lost Jobs: 28.8% Reduction
Percentage Changes: Average Reduction: 21.9%